高宇;孙克红;郭立超;胡胜;

• 1:陕西地建土地勘测规划设计院有限责任公司
• 2:西北大学城市与环境学院

摘要(Abstract)：

针对航测无人机安全评价指标体系的构建,该文应用层次分析法,计算出各指标权重及评价指数,并设定最低安全作业条件,计算出最低安全评价指数,在此基础上,该文发现由各指标赋予权重进行整体评价的结果并不能完整地反映出无人机的客观状态,当计算最低评价指数时,其结果只能作为航测无人机适航必要条件,而不能作为充分条件,由此引入灰色关联度分析法,从系统内部探究各指标与结果的作用关系,进而得出航测无人机安全作业的临界标准条件,即安全评价指数不小于4.17,且灰色关联度不小于0.682。在此基础上,分析20个架次的无人机作业数据,结果表明,将层次分析法与灰色关联度分析相结合,通过整体评价与内部分析,对航测无人机安全作业系统进行全面评价,可以提高评价结果的准确度。

关键词(KeyWords)： 无人机;安全评价;层次分析法;灰色关联度

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation):

作者(Authors): 高宇;孙克红;郭立超;胡胜;

DOI: 10.16251/j.cnki.1009-2307.2018.02.024

参考文献(References)：

• [1]吕厚谊.无人机发展与无人机技术[J].世界科技研究与发展,1998,20(6):113-116.(LHouyi.Development and technology of UAV[J].World Sci-Tech R&D,1998,20(6):113-116.)
• [2]范承啸,韩俊,熊志军,等.无人机遥感技术现状与应用[J].测绘科学,2009,34(5):214-215.(FAN Chengxiao,HAN Jun,XIONG Zhijun,et al.Application and status of ummanned aerial remote sensing technology[J].Science of Surverying and Mapping,2009,34(5):214-215.)
• [3]孙毅.无人机驾驶员航空知识手册[M].北京:中国民航出版社,2015.(SUN Yi.Unmanned aircraft system pilot aviation handbook[M].Beijing:China Civil Aviation Press,2015.)
• [4]程不时.飞机设计手册(第5册):民用飞机总体设计[M].北京:航空工业出版社,2005.(CHENG Bushi.Aircraft design manual book 5:civil aircraft design[M].Beijing:Aviation Industry Press,2005.)
• [5]周焱.无人机地面站发展综述[J].航空电子技术,2010,41(1):1-6.(ZHOU Yan.A review of UAV GCS development[J].Avionics Technology,2010,41(1):1-6.)
• [6]JAMIESON G A.Developing human-machine interfaces to support monitoring of UAV automation[R].Toronto Canada:University of Toronto,2006.
• [7]郭斌,任志远,高孟绪.3S支持的城市土地利用变化与生态安全评价研究[J].测绘科学,2010,35(2):125-129.(GUO Bin,REN Zhiyuan,GAO Mengxu.Research on city land use changing and ecological security evaluation by 3S[J].Science of Surveying and Mapping,2010,35(2):125-129.)
• [8]中国航空工业总公司.飞机区域安全性分析:HB7583—1998[S].[出版地不详]:[出版者不详],1998.(China Aviation Industry Corporation.The area safety analysis of plane:HB 7583—1998[S].[S.l.]:[s.n.],1998.)
• [9]MCCARLEY J,WICKENS C.Human factors implications of UAV in the national airspace[R].Illinois:Aviation Human Factors Division Institute of Aviation,University of Illinois,2005.
• [10]颜春艳.飞机区域安全性分析技术研究[D].南京:南京航空航天大学,2009.(YAN Chunyan.Research on technology of aircraft zonal safety analysis[D].Nanjing:University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2009.)
• [11]陆中,孙有朝,周伽.民用飞机适航符合性验证方法与程序研究[J].航空标准化与质量,2007(4):6-8,19.(LU Zhong,SUN Youchao,ZHOU Jia.Airworthiness compliance approach procedure for civil aircraft[J].Aeronautic Standardization&Quality,2007(4):6-8,19.)
• [12]倪大江.民机安全性工作体系与共模故障分析方法研究[D].南京:南京航空航天大学,2007.(NI Dajiang.Research on civil airplane safety work system and methods of common mode analysis[D].Nanjing:University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2007.)
• [13]WALKER M.Airworthiness standards for australian UAVs[S].Canberra,Australia:Civil Aviation Safety Authority(CASA),2000.
• [14]DEGARMO M.Issues concerning integration of unmanned aerial vehicles in civil airspace[R].McLean,Virginia:Center for Advanced Aviation System Development,2004.
• [15]王韩民.生态安全系统评价与预警研究[J].环境保护,2003(11):30-34.(WANG Hanmin.Evaluation and prediction of ecological security system[J].Environmental Assessment,2003(11):30-34.)
• [16]李玉照,刘永,颜小品.基于DPSIR模型的流域生态安全评价指标体系研究[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),2012,48(6):971-981.(LI Yuzhao,LIU Yong,YAN Xiaopin.A DPSIR-based indicator system for ecological security assessment at the basin scale[J].Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis,2012,48(6):971-981.)
• [17]唐俊,殷晓冬,张立华.基于熵权和AHP的登陆地域选择模糊综合评价方法[J].测绘科学,2010,35(S1):54-56,41.(TANG Jun,YIN Xiaodong,ZHANG Lihua,A fuzzy synthetic evaluating method for selecting the landing area based on entropy and AHP[J].Science of Surveying and Mapping,2010,35(S1):54-56,41.)
• [18]肖新平.关于灰色关联度量化模型的理论研究和评论[J].系统工程理论与实践,1997(8):77-82.(XIAO Xinping.Theoretical study and reviews on the computation method of grey interconnet degree[J].System Engineering Theory&Practice,1997(8):77-82.)
• [19]李宏艳.关于灰色关联度计算方法的研究[J].系统工程与电子技术,2004,26(9):1231-1233,1270.(LI Hongyan.Study on the calculation method of grey relationship degree[J].Systems Engineering and Electronics,2004,26(9):1231-1233,1270.)